Scientists unveil missing link in Evolution

[Grudge]

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World- ... t_Ancestor





Comments?

[Haunty]

Devil's Advocate: how is finding the skeleton of a "lemur-m.onkey" a missing link?

[Grudge]

I have no idea. The news is making this a really exciting find.

[Haunty]

I thought we'd already found the missing link. Christ, we've found enough "ape-man" skeletons to make a pretty cool vampire movie-set from.

[Devy]

[quote name="HbW"]Devil's Advocate: how is finding the skeleton of a "lemur-m.onkey" a missing link?[/quote]



It's to do with the bone structure. The skeleton shares a lot of unique similarities human anatomy, more than any other that has been discovered before. I fail to see how this will silence creationists though, it's not like throwing this little piece of proof onto the enormous pile that already exists is going to help.

[Abzu]

yay!!!

[Haunty]

[quote name="Devy"]
[quote name="HbW"]Devil's Advocate: how is finding the skeleton of a "lemur-m.onkey" a missing link?[/quote]



It's to do with the bone structure. The skeleton shares a lot of unique similarities human anatomy, more than any other that has been discovered before. I fail to see how this will silence creationists though, it's not like throwing this little piece of proof onto the enormous pile that already exists is going to help.[/quote]



Exactly. To creationists, this is just one more variation within primates that has nothing to do with anything else.

[Verbal]

All this "link" does is create two more holes.

[Hugo.]

[quote name="HbW"] .....this is just one more variation within primates that has nothing to do with anything else.[/quote]



If that wasthe case, there wouldnt be such a fuss. They are saying that it could represent the base of the anthropoid branch of the evolutionary tree, which to some people is in fact a big deal.

[Haunty]

[quote name="MorbidAngle"]
[quote name="HbW"] .....this is just one more variation within primates that has nothing to do with anything else.[/quote]



If that wasthe case, there wouldnt be such a fuss. They are saying that it could represent the base of the anthropoid branch of the evolutionary tree, which to some people is in fact a big deal.[/quote]



First part: obviously.

Second part: oh.

[Hugo.]

Finding a fossil with ape-like traits (opposable thumbs and, importantly, nails rather than claws) but also more rodent-like traits is massive because essentially all mammals descend form rodent-like creatures.

[bills bro]