(not so) Amazing Spider-Man

The place for discussing and linking to pictures and videos on the web. It's a sharing economy.
Post Reply
User avatar
Abzu
Postwhore
Posts: 45613
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 08:35
Location: next door

(not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Abzu »

There's a trailer for this on Hulu

http://www.hulu.com/watch/261306/movie- ... spider-man



This looks like complete shit.

:frown:
ANGEL OF DESEASE wrote:the path of whoring is something wicked and grim, and very philosophical.
;,,;
User avatar
agony bagony
Postwhore
Posts: 77363
Joined: 18 Apr 2009, 07:36

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by agony bagony »

tell me again why they needed to make this?
Skinfection wrote:
21 Oct 2020, 20:08
super Jesus people
User avatar
Abzu
Postwhore
Posts: 45613
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 08:35
Location: next door

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Abzu »

Sony are cunts.



They were going to do pt4 but something with Raimi fell through hard and Sony made the idiotic decision to start fresh.
ANGEL OF DESEASE wrote:the path of whoring is something wicked and grim, and very philosophical.
;,,;
User avatar
Abzu
Postwhore
Posts: 45613
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 08:35
Location: next door

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Abzu »

There were also parts 5 and 6 planned, which would be a two part story arc.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spider-Man ... led_sequel
ANGEL OF DESEASE wrote:the path of whoring is something wicked and grim, and very philosophical.
;,,;
User avatar
jawn galliano
Yahtzee Genius
Posts: 24012
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 04:24

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by jawn galliano »

[quote name=";,,;"]Sony are cunts.



They were going to do pt4 but something with Raimi fell through hard and Sony made the idiotic decision to start fresh.[/quote]



can you really blame them after 3
User avatar
agony bagony
Postwhore
Posts: 77363
Joined: 18 Apr 2009, 07:36

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by agony bagony »

thats a lot of money down the pooper
Skinfection wrote:
21 Oct 2020, 20:08
super Jesus people
User avatar
Mesarthim
Lhümbergø
Posts: 21703
Joined: 16 Apr 2009, 08:49
Location: Birdtown, Minnesota

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Mesarthim »

I guess they figure they spent enough of on pre production they might as well get their money worth.
rhino wrote:
20 Dec 2020, 07:48
I'm just getting buzzed up and making dumb threads :bacon:
Verbal wrote:
06 Aug 2021, 04:32
i dont think youre appreciating how much of an idiot i am
User avatar
agony bagony
Postwhore
Posts: 77363
Joined: 18 Apr 2009, 07:36

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by agony bagony »

i wonder how much money it cost to make all the shit movies that major american studios put out this year
Skinfection wrote:
21 Oct 2020, 20:08
super Jesus people
User avatar
Ninny
Metal God
Posts: 16075
Joined: 13 Apr 2009, 15:24
Location: Groaningagain

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Ninny »

Spiderman :xx: A true superhero (who doesn't annoy me). But where's Tobey Maguire :huh:
User avatar
Mesarthim
Lhümbergø
Posts: 21703
Joined: 16 Apr 2009, 08:49
Location: Birdtown, Minnesota

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Mesarthim »

he killed himself.
rhino wrote:
20 Dec 2020, 07:48
I'm just getting buzzed up and making dumb threads :bacon:
Verbal wrote:
06 Aug 2021, 04:32
i dont think youre appreciating how much of an idiot i am
User avatar
M.Bison
Ancient One
Posts: 2320
Joined: 10 May 2009, 02:46
Location: Scumbria

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by M.Bison »

:lol:
Image
User avatar
Abzu
Postwhore
Posts: 45613
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 08:35
Location: next door

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Abzu »

3 made the most money of the franchise, so, considering that's all the studios and publishers give a squirt over...

Raimi left the project because he didn't feel he could meet Sony/Columbia's deadline and still produce a movie he was creatively happy with. He hated each rewrite of the script. They should have just replaced him (which I hate saying because it's Sam fucking Raimi) and kept the continuity rather than this reboot horsecock.
ANGEL OF DESEASE wrote:the path of whoring is something wicked and grim, and very philosophical.
;,,;
User avatar
baron von blondle
Ancient One
Posts: 3660
Joined: 16 Apr 2009, 02:24
Location: In Trouble
Contact:

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by baron von blondle »

[quote name="herr vagina <!-- s]i wonder how much money it cost to make all the shit movies that major american studios put out this year[/quote]



Not as much as they pocketed from the hordes of morons who pay to watch them
Image Image
[quote name="ANGEL OF DESEASE"]Peter Theobalds is a full of win.[/quote]
User avatar
Verbal
The Melancholy Wizards
Posts: 25193
Joined: 18 Apr 2009, 03:05

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Verbal »

about as much as the superiority you condaesent upon them
User avatar
baron von blondle
Ancient One
Posts: 3660
Joined: 16 Apr 2009, 02:24
Location: In Trouble
Contact:

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by baron von blondle »

[quote name="Verbal"]about as much as the superiority you condaesent upon them[/quote]

:fonz:
Image Image
[quote name="ANGEL OF DESEASE"]Peter Theobalds is a full of win.[/quote]
User avatar
Verbal
The Melancholy Wizards
Posts: 25193
Joined: 18 Apr 2009, 03:05

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Verbal »

thats right
User avatar
agony bagony
Postwhore
Posts: 77363
Joined: 18 Apr 2009, 07:36

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by agony bagony »

that doesnt make any sense and you spelled a word incorrectly. but the important thing is that your sense of superiority was clear and it was! :gay:
Skinfection wrote:
21 Oct 2020, 20:08
super Jesus people
User avatar
Abzu
Postwhore
Posts: 45613
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 08:35
Location: next door

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Abzu »

:doubleoldcondaesent:
ANGEL OF DESEASE wrote:the path of whoring is something wicked and grim, and very philosophical.
;,,;
User avatar
Haunty
Metal God
Posts: 12225
Joined: 16 Apr 2009, 01:28
Location: using Thibault to cancel out Capo Ferro

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Haunty »

I don't know... it's pretty hard to out-fail Toby Macguire. Fuck that hard-on bearer, fuck his acting, fuck the retard who cast him, fuck everyone involved in all three of those atrocities. Will this one be any good? Probably not. But at least it's a different actor.
Image



Need a new signature? Why not Zoidberg? (V) (;,,;) (V)
User avatar
Abzu
Postwhore
Posts: 45613
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 08:35
Location: next door

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Abzu »

At least Toby nailed the socially awkward Peter Parker. This version isn't even the slightest nerdy (by the trailer)
ANGEL OF DESEASE wrote:the path of whoring is something wicked and grim, and very philosophical.
;,,;
User avatar
Mesarthim
Lhümbergø
Posts: 21703
Joined: 16 Apr 2009, 08:49
Location: Birdtown, Minnesota

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Mesarthim »

if they really wanted to reboot spiderman they should have gotten Christopher Nolan to do it.
rhino wrote:
20 Dec 2020, 07:48
I'm just getting buzzed up and making dumb threads :bacon:
Verbal wrote:
06 Aug 2021, 04:32
i dont think youre appreciating how much of an idiot i am
User avatar
Abzu
Postwhore
Posts: 45613
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 08:35
Location: next door

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Abzu »

[quote name="lǝp + uɯH + lɹʇƆ"]if they really wanted to reboot spiderman they should have gotten Christopher Nolan to do it.[/quote]

I think it is funny that Anne Hathaway was slated to play Felicia Hardy and now she is playing Selena Kyle.
ANGEL OF DESEASE wrote:the path of whoring is something wicked and grim, and very philosophical.
;,,;
User avatar
deckard
Metal God
Posts: 12485
Joined: 23 Oct 2010, 03:34
Location: THE NORTH

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by deckard »

spider man is gay but i like the hard-on bearer who is playing him in this. he has been in some good films
User avatar
Hugo.
Metal God
Posts: 15495
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 10:05
Location: Ireland

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Hugo. »

Spiderman 2 was definitely one of the best marvel movies. 3 Was definitely one of worst.



Besides Thor or daredevil I can't think of anything worse.
Image
User avatar
Abzu
Postwhore
Posts: 45613
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 08:35
Location: next door

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Abzu »

[quote name="Hugo"]Spiderman 2 was definitely one of the best marvel movies. 3 Was definitely one of worst.



Besides Thor or daredevil I can't think of anything worse.[/quote]

gloryhole era Marvel movies
ANGEL OF DESEASE wrote:the path of whoring is something wicked and grim, and very philosophical.
;,,;
User avatar
Hugo.
Metal God
Posts: 15495
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 10:05
Location: Ireland

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Hugo. »

gloryhole era marvel movies were better in the era of the gloryhole :santa:
Image
User avatar
Abzu
Postwhore
Posts: 45613
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 08:35
Location: next door

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Abzu »

I think they were better in the 50s
ANGEL OF DESEASE wrote:the path of whoring is something wicked and grim, and very philosophical.
;,,;
User avatar
Hugo.
Metal God
Posts: 15495
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 10:05
Location: Ireland

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Hugo. »

When they didn't exist?



I get it. :gay:
Image
User avatar
Abzu
Postwhore
Posts: 45613
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 08:35
Location: next door

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Abzu »

:brushteeth:
ANGEL OF DESEASE wrote:the path of whoring is something wicked and grim, and very philosophical.
;,,;
User avatar
Haunty
Metal God
Posts: 12225
Joined: 16 Apr 2009, 01:28
Location: using Thibault to cancel out Capo Ferro

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Haunty »

Let's all agree that they should've gotten the hard-on bearer who played Sandman to play Eddie Brock/Venom, Topher Grace to play Peter Parker/Spider Man, and left the Sandman character out completely.
Image



Need a new signature? Why not Zoidberg? (V) (;,,;) (V)
User avatar
Abzu
Postwhore
Posts: 45613
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 08:35
Location: next door

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Abzu »

[quote name="HbW"]Let's all agree that they should've gotten the hard-on bearer who played Sandman to play Eddie Brock/Venom, Topher Grace to play Peter Parker/Spider Man, and left the Sandman character out completely.[/quote]

I can agree with that.
ANGEL OF DESEASE wrote:the path of whoring is something wicked and grim, and very philosophical.
;,,;
User avatar
Hugo.
Metal God
Posts: 15495
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 10:05
Location: Ireland

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Hugo. »

Yep.
Image
User avatar
Haunty
Metal God
Posts: 12225
Joined: 16 Apr 2009, 01:28
Location: using Thibault to cancel out Capo Ferro

Re: (not so) Amazing Spider-Man

Post by Haunty »

see, how hard was that? casting directors :frown:
Image



Need a new signature? Why not Zoidberg? (V) (;,,;) (V)
Post Reply