Page 1 of 1
i'm not a big ironbird fan but...
Posted: 26 Nov 2011, 14:48
by Jackson
this thing is sexy!!!
<!-- m -->
http://www.cmcguitars.com/BC-Rich-USA-C ... b%20cs.htm<!-- m -->
EMGs,sexy body shape,no Floyd Rose - that's all i need!

Re: i'm not a big ironbird fan but...
Posted: 26 Nov 2011, 16:23
by Lavabug
Meh, an Ironbird without a floyd is like a bird without wings. I really dig the modern pro bird:
Paf pro in the bridge and that would be sweet. I loved how my old NJ sounded/felt with the paf pro and OFR, too bad the neck/frets played like crap.
Re: i'm not a big ironbird fan but...
Posted: 26 Nov 2011, 16:52
by Jackson
The look of that wood:
Give me that Chinese splendid mate of mine without FR + diamond inlays,and i would be happy!
This Stealth looks awesome too!

Re: i'm not a big ironbird fan but...
Posted: 26 Nov 2011, 20:17
by Anjel
Re: i'm not a big ironbird fan but...
Posted: 27 Nov 2011, 16:23
by shadowalk
If that Ironbird Lavabutt posted has a fixed bridge version, then that guitar would be most

Re: i'm not a big ironbird fan but...
Posted: 27 Nov 2011, 18:34
by Lavabug
BCR should hook up Erik Rutan with that bird I posted, it would suit him. :cavemanironbird:
Re: i'm not a big ironbird fan but...
Posted: 27 Nov 2011, 20:36
by Abzu
Re: i'm not a big ironbird fan but...
Posted: 27 Nov 2011, 23:19
by Uni777
The red one is cool though i hate the way they angled the grain of the headstock overlay. And i still think the Mark-I shape looks better.
A lot of the spalted Birds Pro are not that nice looking. And i have seen several with badly executed bursted edges. Personally i do not like the spalted head overlay with black logo. The white script logo on black looks better to me. I have the black one with the silver bevels mostly for that reason. I got it cause at the time i thought it would be nice for the collection to add a Mark II shape. I might have it repainted next year. Though IRL the bevel is not that ugly.
Price/quality wise it is pretty OK. I replaced the EMG for a dual-sound. Floyd works nice as do the tuners. And it is a very stable guitar. I wil not tune it lover than Eb due to the 24 3/4 cale lenght. The Korean deluxe series are cosmetically better looking though.
Out of all the imports i've owned or played the two Japanese IG-400 guitars i have are the best playing and sounding. Eventhough they are bolt-ons.
Re: i'm not a big ironbird fan but...
Posted: 28 Nov 2011, 00:45
by Shredlord
[quote name="Jackson"]Give me that Chinese splendid mate of mine without FR + diamond inlays,and i would be happy![/quote]
Buy American, bitches!
Re: i'm not a big ironbird fan but...
Posted: 28 Nov 2011, 01:23
by Uni777
An American guitar is also an import for me as i am Dutch.
I've owned several US made guitars. Gibsons, Rich and Jackson. All good guitars but the Rich was the only one without cosmetic or practical issues. So far the best guitars i have (owned) are the custom made Dutch ones and the japanese guitars i have.
The Jackson had finish flaws ( runners in the clear coat), a locknut with to wide screw holes and went severely out of tune after locking the pads as the head angle and the lock-nut did not match up. Th e japanese Kevin Bond i have was a better guitar on all fronts. The Gibsons all had sub-par fret ends/work and several finish flaws. All fixable sans the paint flaws but on a guitar in that price range that should not be nessesary. None of the Ibanez guitars i have have these issues not even the indonesian Xiphos.
For less than the price of a US made guitar i can have a local luthier make me a guitar exactly to my specs with better quality woods than the standard production line quality of the afore mentioned guitars. Plus i can test it during the building stages.
I couldn't care less where a guitar is made as long as it is a solid instrument (and not fabricated by child labour). But i refuse to pay for Made in the USA on a guitar when the price/quality does not match up.
Re: i'm not a big ironbird fan but...
Posted: 05 Dec 2011, 09:32
by SCUNT
the best guitar I've ever owned was an early 80's B.C. Rich NJ series Warlock with a kahler tremolo. Had the weight and neck fatness of a gibson without being a gibson

Re: i'm not a big ironbird fan but...
Posted: 05 Dec 2011, 13:37
by shadowalk
I have an Indonesian Ibanez RG with a fixed bridge and though I'm no expert on guitar craftsmanship, I don't see or notice anything particularly wrong with it, weakest link would be the pickups which I have changed to an EMG 81/85 set. It also plays very, very nice.
Re: i'm not a big ironbird fan but...
Posted: 05 Dec 2011, 23:19
by Hallucinating dead
[quote name="Jackson"]
[/quote]

Re: i'm not a big ironbird fan but...
Posted: 06 Dec 2011, 04:20
by Jackson
Re: i'm not a big ironbird fan but...
Posted: 08 Dec 2011, 05:34
by SCUNT
but those aren't early 80's b.c. rich warlocks with kahlers

Re: i'm not a big ironbird fan but...
Posted: 08 Dec 2011, 18:34
by Jackson
[quote name="smelly"]but those aren't early 80's b.c. rich warlocks with kahlers

[/quote]
Yeah,but Terrance Hobbs is so sexy!
