Page 1 of 1

Angel Dust vs King for a Day

Posted: 11 Feb 2023, 06:02
by Ninny
I say Angel Dust :bang:

Re: Angel Dust vs King for a Day

Posted: 11 Feb 2023, 07:33
by Ryeknow
King for a day, as a whole, but only by a cunt hair

Re: Angel Dust vs King for a Day

Posted: 12 Feb 2023, 06:32
by Ryeknow
Just wondering, is faith no more done? What's going on with them? They are all 60 I think with the exception of Patton. I just seems like they did what they did with the reunion, and letting the band rest for good now

Re: Angel Dust vs King for a Day

Posted: 12 Feb 2023, 07:26
by slugbait
Ryeknow wrote:
11 Feb 2023, 07:33
King for a day, as a whole, but only by a cunt hair
This. I don't think the band would've been able to go in the direction they did if Jim Martin had stayed.

Re: Angel Dust vs King for a Day

Posted: 12 Feb 2023, 08:00
by Ryeknow
True, I remember reading something where Jim said he was unhappy about his guitar parts or lack there of on angel dust. Ironic their next album without him would be their most guitar driven album

Re: Angel Dust vs King for a Day

Posted: 13 Feb 2023, 22:55
by User
i prefer angel dust :santa:

it is more of a classical cunt mix of disco, rock and metal, king for a day feels more 'patton' but less 'fnm'

Re: Angel Dust vs King for a Day

Posted: 13 Feb 2023, 23:09
by agony bagony
angel king vs dust for a day